Skip to Content

Damianos imperial kommerkiarios of Thessalonica and paraphylax of Abydos (ninth century)

 
 

Obverse

Cruciform invocative monogram (type V). In the quarters: τ-σ|δ-λ. No border visible.

Θεοτόκε βοήθει τῷ σῷ δούλῳ

Reverse

Inscription of four lines. No border visible.

+δμι
νβκομε
ρκθεσλSπ
ρφ⸉βυδ

Δαμιαν(ῷ) β(ασιλικῷ) κομερκ(ιαρίῳ) Θεσαλ(ονίκης) (καὶ) π[α]ραφ(ύλακι) Ἀβυδ(ου)

Obverse

Cruciform invocative monogram (type V). In the quarters: τ-σ|δ-λ. No border visible.

Θεοτόκε βοήθει τῷ σῷ δούλῳ

Reverse

Inscription of four lines. No border visible.

+δμι
νβκομε
ρκθεσλSπ
ρφ⸉βυδ

Δαμιαν(ῷ) β(ασιλικῷ) κομερκ(ιαρίῳ) Θεσαλ(ονίκης) (καὶ) π[α]ραφ(ύλακι) Ἀβυδ(ου)

Accession number BZS.1955.1.792
Diameter 30.0 mm
Previous Editions

DO Seals 3, no. 40.22.

Zacos-Veglery, no. 1840.

Translation

Θεοτόκε βοήθει τῷ σῷ δούλῳ Δαμιανῷ βασιλικῷ κομερκιαρίῳ Θεσαλονίκης καὶ παραφύλακι Ἀβυδου.

Mother of God, help your servant Damianos, imperial kommerkiarios of Thessalonica and paraphylax of Abydos.

Commentary

As noted in DO Seals 1, no. 18.36, it is difficult to know if "Abydos" in this inscription should be spelled with a capital or not. If we choose abydos, then the inscription would read "Damianos imperial kommerkiarios of Thessalonika and paraphylax of [the] abydos [of Thessalonica]," that is, the military commander of the fortress monitoring the movement of goods in the port of Thessalonica (cf. Oikonomides, Abydos). This is one possibility. But in that case the phrase παραφύλακι ἀβύδου should precede the function of κομερκιαρίῳ Θεσσαλονίκης because the place where an official is effectively serving is normally mentioned last. The other possibility would be that Damianos exercised two functions, each separate from the other in terms of geography: he was kommerkiarios of Thessalonica and paraphylax of Abydos (of the Hellespont); at least in one of the two places, he must have operated through representatives. It is not easy to decide between the two.

The city of Abydos, at the entrance of the Hellespont, has always had great importance as a point of control of the straits. From the fifth to the eighth centuries the main official mentioned there is the komes, who received his salary from the state, taxed the bypassing ships (texts put together by Zacos-Veglery, p. 1637), and sometimes accumulated the command of the Hieron, at the exit from the Bosporus to the Black Sea. The komes disappears with the eighth century, and a military governor of the fortress, the paraphylax, makes his appearance and is attested by many seals in the ninth century; sometimes he cumulates the office of kommerkiarios (cf. Listes, 343). The controls made in Abydos gave their name to a special institution, the abydos, which appears in other parts of the empire, most of all in Thessalonica and which gave its name to the title of abydikos (cf. Oikonomides, AbydosDO Seals 1.18).

The earliest known kommerkiarios [of the apotheke] of Abydos is attested in the mid-seventh century; other kommerkiarioi are attested in the eighth century, and more appear in the ninth, when they are obviously related to the collection of a duty from passing ships (this is clearly attested in 992: Zepos, Jus I, 260-261), no doubt the kommerkion, which appears around the year 800. Maybe they were also called phorologoi.

An archon of Abydos is also attested by a seal and a text around the year 800. It is not impossible that this title existed only for a limited time and, for this reason, is mentioned in few sources only at a period of transition.

Together with the rest of the littoral of the Opsikion, Abydos belonged also to the naval theme of Aigaion Pelagos, was normally visited by the strategos (Arhweiler, Mer, 78), and seemed to have been the seat of a tourmarches. We shall ignore here a ninth-century seal (Zacos-Veglery, no. 3088) that probably belonged to a strategos of the Kibyrraiotai (and not of Abydos as initially published; cf. the remark of W. Seibt, in ByzSl 36 [1975] 212). A strategos is said to be sent to Abydos in 963 (Leo the Deacon, Bonn, 44), but he could well be a strategos of the Aigaion. The first secure mention of a strategos of Abydos is of the year 1004, and again in 1025 and 1033, often with maritime duties (Skylitzes, 346, 368, 388). In the eleventh century he exercised authority to the northern shore of the Dardanelles as well as on the islands (at Madytos: Sathas, MB V, 423, 487), a detail that shows he was in fact a naval commander, such as the strategos of the Aigaion. A katepano of Abydos appears in 1086 (Lavra I, no. 48, line 3). The city's fortifications were repaired by Manuel I Komnenos (Theodori Prodromi, De Manganis, ed. S. Bernardinello [Padua, 1972], 79, 80).

In this context, one can understand the existence of typically naval thematic officials at Abydos, such as the kentarchos. On the contrary, the existence of a seventh/eighth-century chartoularios of Abydos (Zacos-Veglery, no. 867A) should be related to the early theme of the Opsikion rather than to the Karabisianoi, who seem not have had any thematic structure.

From the earliest period, Abydos was a suffragan bishopric of Kyzikos (DHGE 1, cols. 209-10). It became a metropolis at the beginning of the reign of Alexios I Komnenos (1084?) and retained this rank until the Turkish conquest in the fourteenth century (cf. Laurent, Corpus V/1, 622). To the seals of bishops and metropolitans mentioned by Laurent, one can now add those of Basil (bishop?) and Michael and Demetrios metropolitans (Zacos, Seals II, nos. 374, 587; Lihaçev, Molivdovuly, 130-31, pl. LXVI, no. 2).

See Bibicou, Recherches, 179-81; H. Arhweiler, "Fonctionnaires et bureaux maritimes à Byzance," REB 19 (1961) 239-52; Arhweiler, Mer, passim; Oikonomides, Abydos; ODB 1, 8-9.

Bibliography