...tes imperial mandator and domestikos of the Boukellarioi (eighth century)
Obverse
Cruciform invocative monogram (probably type VIII); in the quarters: ...|ΔΛ. Wreath border.
Obverse
Cruciform invocative monogram (probably type VIII); in the quarters: ...|ΔΛ. Wreath border.
Reverse
Inscription of at least five lines. Indeterminate border.
ΤΗΒ/ΜΑ
ΝΑΤ/S
ΟΜΕΣΤ/Τ
ΒΚΕ
....τῃ βασιλικῷ μανδάτωρι καὶ δομεστίκῳ τῶν Βουκελλαρίων.
Accession number | BZS.1958.106.1993 |
---|---|
Diameter | 25.0 mm |
Previous Editions | DO Seals 4, no. 1.5. Zacos-Veglery, no. 2601. |
Translation
Κύριε Βοήθει τῷ σῷ δούλῳ ....τῃ βασιλικῷ μανδάτωρι καὶ δομεστίκῳ τῶν Βουκελλαρίων.
Lord, help your servant ...tes, imperial mandator and domestikos of the Boukellarioi.
Bibliography
- Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art, Vol. 4: The East (Open in Zotero)
- Byzantinische Rang- und Ämterstruktur im 8. und 9. Jahrhundert: Faktoren und Tendenzen ihrer Entwicklung (Open in Zotero)
- Byzantine Praetorians: An Administrative, Institutional, and Social Survey of the Opsikion and Tagmata, c. 580-900 (Open in Zotero)
- Byzantine Lead Seals, Vol. 1 (Open in Zotero)
- Byzantine Lead Seals, Vol. 2 (Open in Zotero)
- Les listes de préséance byzantines des IXe et Xe siècles (Open in Zotero)
- Galatien und Lykaonien (Open in Zotero)
- De Thematibus (Open in Zotero)
- Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium (Open in Zotero)
- Paphlagonien und Honorias (Open in Zotero)
- Η Μικρά Ασία των θεμάτων. Ἐρευνες πάνω στην γεωγραφική φυσιογνωμία και προσωπογραφία των βυζαντινών θεμάτων της Μικράς Ασίας (Open in Zotero)
Commentary
The omission of the final ν of τῶν, and the fact that no abbreviation sign appears there, may be due to euphonic reasons. The owner's first name could be Ἀσώτης (Ashot) or Παγκράτης (Bagrat); it sounds like a name of Armenian origin. One could also propose [Λέον]τη with a spelling mistake. The seal of another domestikos of the Boukellarioi, of the first half of the eighth century, is published by Zacos-Veglery, no. 1656. See the remarks of Winkelmann, Ämterstruktur, 99, and Haldon, Praetorians, 495, n. 558.