Skip to Content

Michael asekretis and protonotarios of the Armenian themes (tenth/eleventh century)

 
 

Obverse

Indistinct bust of St. Michael holding a scepter. Sigla: μ-χ : Μ(ι)χ(αήλ). Remains of a circular inscription within a border of dots:

R,θ,τσδ,

[Κύριε] β(οή)θ(ει) τῷ σῷ δ(ούλῳ)

Reverse

Inscription of five lines, decorations above and below. Border of dots.

– 
μιχαη
ασηκρη
τ,Sα̅,νοτ,ρ,
τοναρμ,
θεματˋ
– 

Μιχαὴ(λ) ἀσηκρῆτ(ις) (καὶ) (πρωτο)νοτ(α)ρ(ίῳ) τον Ἀρμ(ενικῶν) θεμάτ(ων)

Obverse

Indistinct bust of St. Michael holding a scepter. Sigla: μ-χ : Μ(ι)χ(αήλ). Remains of a circular inscription within a border of dots:

R,θ,τσδ,

[Κύριε] β(οή)θ(ει) τῷ σῷ δ(ούλῳ)

Reverse

Inscription of five lines, decorations above and below. Border of dots.

– 
μιχαη
ασηκρη
τ,Sα̅,νοτ,ρ,
τοναρμ,
θεματˋ
– 

Μιχαὴ(λ) ἀσηκρῆτ(ις) (καὶ) (πρωτο)νοτ(α)ρ(ίῳ) τον Ἀρμ(ενικῶν) θεμάτ(ων)

Accession number BZS.1955.1.2806
Diameter 26.0 mm
Previous Editions

DO Seals 4, no. 56.15.

Seibt, "Ἀρμενικὰ θέματα", 137, no. 21.

Translation

Κύριε βοήθει τῷ σῷ δούλῳ Μιχαὴλ ἀσηκρῆτις καὶ πρωτονοταρίῳ τον Ἀρμενικῶν θεμάτων.

Lord, help your servant Michael, asekretis and protonotarios of the Armenian themes.

Commentary

First attested in the middle of the tenth century, the “Armenian themes” drew their name from the Armenian groups which settled along the eastern frontier of the empire. They covered small territories, made up essentially of one fortress and its region, they provided mainly footsoldiers (less than a thousand each) and had  a distinct administrative structure characterized by the large number of “tourmarchai” (the Charpezikion had 22 major toumarchai and 47 lesser ones). The Armenian themes (tentative list in Kühn, Armee, 61-64), scattered along the eastern frontier, were thus differentiated from the larger, traditional “Roman themes” lying to the interior. See Oikonomides, Listes, 345-46; Oikonomides, “Organisation;” and the recent and exhaustive study of W. Seibt, “Ἀρμενικὰ θέματα als terminus technicus der byzantinischen Verwaltungsgeschichte des 11. Jahrhunderts,” ByzSl 54 (1993) 134-41. Each Armenian theme had its own (low-grade) strategos (called zirwar by the Arabs, zoravar by the Armenians); in the XIth c. do we meet a strategos of the Armenian themes in general (Zacos, Seals II, no. 844), indicating an effort to centralize the command of these scattered units. The numerous seals of the financial officials in our collection reflect the economic importance of the Armenian themes while those of the judicial officials bear witness to the effort necessary to maintain law and order in these frontier zones, especially in an Armenian population, notorious for its lack of discipline (E. McGeer, The Land Legislation of the Macedonian Emperors [Toronto, 2000] 86-89).

Bibliography

  • Catalogue of Byzantine Seals at Dumbarton Oaks and in the Fogg Museum of Art, Vol. 4: The East (Open in Zotero)
  • Die byzantinische Armee im 10. und 11. Jahrhundert: Studien zur Organisation der Tagmata (Open in Zotero)
  • Les listes de préséance byzantines des IXe et Xe siècles (Open in Zotero)
  • L’organisation de la frontière orientale de Byzance aux Xe-XIe siècles et Le Taktikon de l’Escorial (Open in Zotero)
  • Ἀρμενικὰ Θέματα als terminus technicus der byzantinischen Verwaltungsgeschichte des 11. Jahrhunderts (Open in Zotero)
  • Byzantine Lead Seals, Vol. 2 (Open in Zotero)
  • The Land Legislation of the Macedonian Emperors (Open in Zotero)